SEM PESSOAS, SEM ELEIÇÕES: DISCUTINDO AS MOTIVAÇÕES DOS MESÁRIOS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.71381/1338dd54Palabras clave:
GOVERNANÇA ELEITORAL; MOTIVAÇÕES; VOLUNTÁRIOS; MESÁRIOS; RECURSOS HUMANOSResumen
Este artigo explora as motivações que levam os mesários voluntários a participarem das eleições. Apresenta os resultados de um survey online realizado com voluntários no município de Volta Redonda, localizado no interior do estado do Rio de Janeiro. O estudo também oferece uma atenção especial ao papel dos recursos humanos, e analisa como o engajamento voluntário funciona como um componente essencial da governança eleitoral — especialmente em sua dimensão pessoal. Os resultados sugerem que as motivações intrínsecas, como o senso de dever cívico e o desejo de contribuir para o processo democrático, tendem a ter mais peso do que fatores extrínsecos, como os benefícios materiais.
Referencias
Alvarez, R. M., Hall, T. E., & Roberts, B. F. (2005). Caltech/MIT Voting Technology Project. California Institute of Technology and MIT.
Bispo Júnior, J. P. (2022). Viés de desejabilidade social na pesquisa qualitativa em saúde. Revista de Saúde Pública, 56, 101.
Burden, Barry C.; MILYO, Jeffrey (2015). The quantities and qualities of poll workers. Election Law Journal, 14(1), 38-46.
Carlomagno, M. C. (2018). Conduzindo pesquisas com questionários online: Uma introdução às questões metodológicas. Estudando Cultura e Comunicação com MídiasSociais, 31.
Clark, Alistair (2017). Identifying the determinants of electoral integrity and administration in advanced democracies: the case of Britain. European Political Science Review, 9(3), 471–492.
Clark, A., & James, T. S. (2023). Electoral administration and the problem of poll worker recruitment: Who volunteers, and why?. Public Policy and Administration, 38(2), 188-208.
Cox, Gary W. (1997). Making votes count strategic coordination in the world's electoral systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Elklit, Jørgen; Reynolds, Andrew. (2005a). A framework for the systematic study of election quality. Democratization,12(2), 147-162.
Elklit, Jørgen; Reynolds, Andrew. (2005b). Judging elections and election management quality by the process. Representation, 41(3), 189-207.
Glaser B; Macdonald K; Hui I et al. (2007). Explaining Voting System Performance: Do Technology, Training, and Poll Worker Characteristics Matter? Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association.
Glaser, B. E., et al. (2007). The front lines of democracy: Who staffs polling places and does it matter? EARC Working Paper 0704.
Hall, Thad E.; Quin Monson, J.; Patterson, Kelly D. (2009). The human dimension of elections: How poll workers shape public confidence in elections. PoliticalResearchQuarterly, 62(3), 507-522.
Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística (IBGE). (2024). Pesquisa Nacional por Amostra de Domicílios Contínua (PNAD) 2024. Available in: https://www.ibge.gov.br/estatisticas/sociais/trabalho/17270-pnad-continua.html. Access in 04 ago. 2024.
IPEA – Instituto de Pesquisa Econômica Aplicada (2020). Taxa de câmbio comercial para venda: real (R$) / dólar americano (US$) – média 2020. Available in: http://www.ipeadata.gov.br/ExibeSerie.aspx?serid=31924. Access in 13 out. 2021.
James, Toby; Garnett, Holly; Loeber, Leontine; Van Ham, Carolien. (2019). Electoral management and the organisational determinants of electoral integrity: Introduction. International Political Science Review, 40(3), 295–312.
James, Toby. (2019). Better workers, better elections? Electoral management bodywork forces and electoral integrity worldwide. International Political Science Review, 40(3), 370–390.
Kimball, David C. et al. (2009). Poll workers and election administration: the view from local election officials. In: Midwest Political Science Association Annual Meeting.Chicago.
Lijphart, Arend. (1994). Democracies: Forms, performance, and constitutional engineering. European Journal of Political Research, 25(1), 1–17.
Lipsky, Michael. (1971). Street-level bureaucracy and the analysis of urban reform. Urban affairs quarterly, 6(4), 391–409.
Lipsky, Michael. (2010). Street-level bureaucracy: Dilemmas of the individual in public service. Russell Sage Foundation.
Lundstedt, Martin; Edgell, Amanda B. (2020). Institutions of Electoral Integrity and Clientelism: The Role of Electoral Management Bodies. V-DemWorkingPaper, 108.
Marchetti, Vitor. (2008). Governança Eleitoral: o modelo brasileiro de Justiça Eleitoral. Dados, 51, 865-893.
Marchetti, Vitor. (2012). Electoral governance in Brazil. Brazilian Political Science Review, 6(1), 113-133.
Marchetti, Vitor. (2013). Justiça e competição eleitoral. Santo André: Universidade Federal do ABC.
Mesch, Debra J. et al. (1998). Altruists or egoists? Retention in stipended service. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 9(1), 3–22.
Mozaffar, Shaheen; Schedler, Andreas. (2002). The comparative study of electoral governance—introduction. International Political Science Review, 23(1), 5-27.
Norris, Pippa. (2015). Why elections fail. Cambridge University Press.
Norris, Pippa. (2019). Conclusions: The new research agenda on electoral management. International Political Science Review, 40(3), 391–403.
Orozco-Henríquez, J. (2010). Electoral Justice: The International IDEA Handbook. Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
Pastor, Robert A. (1999). The role of electoral administration in democratic transitions: Implications for policy and research. Democratization, 6 (4), 1-27.
Sabatier, Paul A. (1986). Top-down and bottom-up approaches to implementation research: a critical analysis and suggested synthesis. Journal of public policy, 6(1), 21–48.
Taagepera, Rein; Shugart, Matthew S. (1989). Designing electoral systems.ElectoralStudies, 8(1), 49-58.
Tarouco, Gabriela. (2014). Governança eleitoral: modelos institucionais e legitimação. In.: Cadernos Adenauer, XV (1). Justiça Eleitoral. Rio de Janeiro: Fundação Konrad Adenauer.
Tschirhart, Mary, et al. (2001). Stipended volunteers: Their goals, experiences, satisfaction, and likelihood of future service. NonprofitandVoluntary Sector Quarterly, 30(3), 422–443.
Tribunal Superior Eleitoral. (2020). Mesárias e mesários nas eleições de 2020. Available in:https://sig.tse.jus.br/ords/dwapr/r/seai/sig-eleicao-mesarios/home?session=201241473013253. Access in 18 set. 2023.
Van Ham, Carolien; Lindberg, Staffan. (2015). When Guardians Matter Most: Exploring the conditions under which electoral management body institutional design affects election integrity. Irish Political Studies, 30(4), 454-481.
Wright, K. B. (2005). Researching internet-based populations: Advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(3), JCMC1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2005.tb00259.x
Zuccolotto, Vinicius Rodrigues. (2020). Competição partidária na América Latina: a governança eleitoral importa? Tese de Doutorado apresentada ao Programa de Pós-graduação em Ciência Política da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Available in:https://attena.ufpe.br/bitstream/123456789/39091/1/TESE%20Vinicius%20Rodrigues%20Zuccolotto.pdf. Access in 18 set. 2021.
Descargas
Publicado
Número
Sección
Licencia
Derechos de autor 2025 Revista Justiça Eleitoral em Debate
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.